April 15, 2025 | MedLegalNews.com
Age and Disability Bias Suit: In a key ruling for California workers, the Fourth District Court of Appeal has allowed Hermenegildo Gonzalez, a former employee of Blue Banner Co. Inc. (BB), to proceed with his claims of age discrimination, disability discrimination, retaliation, and wrongful termination.
Longtime Employee Claims Pattern of Retaliation
Gonzalez worked for the fruit-packing company for over 35 years. However, in 2019 and 2020, his employment became increasingly turbulent. After experiencing a slip and fall and back pain from a forklift accident, Gonzalez began reporting symptoms—though he initially declined employer-provided medical attention.
Soon after he disclosed his back pain to BB’s human resources team in February 2020, the disciplinary actions began to escalate. Within five weeks, BB issued multiple warnings and ultimately terminated Gonzalez, allegedly for a forklift safety violation. That same day, Gonzalez filed a formal complaint with the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing (DFEH) and received a right-to-sue letter. Age and Disability Bias Suit
Court Finds Sufficient Evidence of Discrimination
Blue Banner argued that Gonzalez was let go for a legitimate, non-discriminatory reason. However, both the trial judge and the appellate court disagreed. The court found Gonzalez had presented enough evidence to suggest:
- He was replaced by a much younger employee
- Other, younger employees were not disciplined for similar conduct
- His disciplinary history ramped up shortly after new management took over
Given these facts, the appellate panel determined that age discrimination could be a motivating factor behind the termination.
Disability and Workers’ Comp Retaliation Also at Issue
In addition to age, the court found strong indicators of disability discrimination and retaliation. Gonzalez notified BB of his work-related back injury just days before receiving two disciplinary notices and being fired. This close timing, combined with the nature of the infractions, suggested pretext.
Moreover, Gonzalez had filed a workers’ compensation claim shortly before the termination. The court agreed there was enough evidence for a jury to consider whether the firing was an act of retaliation against his protected activities.
Lawsuit Moves Forward
The case—Blue Banner Co. Inc. v. Superior Court (Gonzalez), No. E083453—remains unpublished but sets a notable example. Workers who face retaliation or termination soon after reporting injuries or asserting their rights may have strong legal grounds to pursue justice.
📄 Full court opinion available here (Blue Banner v. Gonzalez)
Read More from MedLegalNews.com
- Jury Awards $145M for Unreasonable Denial of Comp Claim
- DWC Posts Reminder for the Return-to-Work Supplement Program (RTWSP)
- Labor Org Owners Sentenced to Prison for Fraud Scheme
- CA Insurance Commissioner Reappoints Two to WCIRB Governing Committee
- Support Fire Recovery Efforts: California Invests $25 Million