September 26, 2025 | New Orleans, LA — MedLegalNews.com – Arbitration is central to a high-stakes Louisiana hurricane insurance dispute. A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit is examining whether two Louisiana homeowners’ hurricane-damage claims stem from a single master policy or multiple individual contracts. The answer could determine if eight domestic insurers can compel arbitration, a process that often limits courtroom discovery and appeals.
Louisiana Law Versus Federal Arbitration Rules
Louisiana’s insurance code, particularly La. R.S. 22:868, generally bars clauses that strip state courts of jurisdiction. Insurers argue that a 2020 amendment—subsection (D)—creates an exception for surplus-lines policies, while policyholders counter that the statute still blocks mandatory private dispute resolution..
Insurers, however, point to a 2020 amendment adding subsection (D), which they claim provides a narrow exception for surplus-lines policies, a category often used when coverage is placed with non-admitted carriers. They argue that this change signals legislative approval of arbitration in those specialized contracts. Policyholders disagree, insisting the amendment was never meant to open the door to mandatory arbitration and that the statute, read as a whole, still forbids clauses compelling parties to bypass state courts. This tension between the amended state law and federal arbitration principles lies at the heart of the Fifth Circuit’s review.
Domestic and Foreign Insurer Divide
The dispute also highlights a split between domestic insurers and foreign carriers. If any foreign insurer is involved, the New York Convention—an international treaty favoring binding private dispute resolution—could override state restrictions and reshape the court’s analysis.
This distinction matters because U.S. courts have consistently held that the Convention—implemented through the Federal Arbitration Act—can preempt conflicting state statutes when at least one party is a non-U.S. insurer or reinsurer. If the panel determines that a foreign carrier is indeed a party to the contracts, the treaty’s pro-arbitration mandate could compel arbitration even where Louisiana law would normally forbid it, setting a significant precedent for multi-insurer hurricane policies across the Gulf Coast.
Broader Impact on Policyholders and Insurers
For homeowners: The decision will influence whether future hurricane-damage claims are decided by a jury or a private arbitrator.
For insurers: A ruling that upholds arbitration could encourage broader use of multi-insurer contracts and tighter language.
For regulators and courts: The outcome could guide how state anti-arbitration statutes interact with federal and international law, shaping future legislation and judicial interpretation well beyond Louisiana. A clear Fifth Circuit precedent may influence how other Gulf Coast states draft insurance regulations and how judges nationwide balance state protections with the pro-arbitration policies embedded in federal and international agreements.
What Comes Next
The Fifth Circuit has not announced a timetable for its decision, but its ruling could clarify how state limits on private dispute-resolution clauses interact with federal and international law—guidance that courts across the Gulf Coast have been awaiting.
For a detailed overview of Louisiana’s restrictions, visit the Louisiana Law Blog analysis. This resource explains recent Fifth Circuit rulings and the state statute in plain language.
Stay informed and subscribe to MedLegalNews.com for breaking appellate decisions and insurance-law updates.
🔗 Read More from MedLegalNews.com:
- California Unconscious Bias Training Supreme Court Appeal
- California Medi-Cal Cuts for Undocumented Immigrants in Budget Deal
- California Medicaid Funding Gap Addressed With $2.8B Plan
- Care Facility Insurer Lawsuit Over Patient Death Coverage
- Flu Vaccine Injury Claim Federal Circuit Ruling Upholds Dismissal
FAQs: Fifth Circuit Arbitration Case
Why does the number of insurance policies matter?
If there is only one policy, all participating insurers may be bound to any arbitration clause. Multiple policies could limit who must arbitrate.
What is La. R.S. 22:868?
This Louisiana statute prohibits insurance contracts from removing jurisdiction from state courts, effectively banning many clauses.
How could the New York Convention affect the case?
If foreign insurers are parties, this treaty can require U.S. courts to enforce agreements despite state prohibitions.
What does this mean for future hurricane claims?
A pro-arbitration ruling could shift many large-loss disputes from courtrooms to private arbitration panels.