January 10, 2025 – Disability Discrimination Case : A federal court in California has ruled in favor of Costco Wholesale Corp., dismissing a lawsuit brought by Margarita Zamora, a former employee who claimed wrongful termination and violations of the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA). The case, Margarita Zamora v. Costco Wholesale Corp., was filed on January 3rd in the U.S. District Court for Northern California.
Background of the Disability Discrimination Case
Zamora sustained a shoulder injury in March 2018 after falling off a ladder while working as a stocker at a Redwood City Costco warehouse. This injury significantly limited her ability to lift, pull, or push more than 10 pounds, effectively preventing her from returning to her stocker duties.
Efforts to Accommodate Zamora
Disability Discrimination Case: Following surgery and other treatments, Zamora reached maximum medical improvement in August 2020. During a subsequent meeting with Costco officials, she proposed performing alternative tasks, such as cleaning or other modified duties. However, the court highlighted that FEHA does not require employers to create light-duty positions for disabled employees who are unable to fulfill essential job functions.
Court’s Findings
The court found that Costco had engaged in a good-faith interactive process to identify a suitable accommodation for Zamora’s disability. Despite exploring various options, including temporary assignments involving smaller items after her initial injury, no permanent position matched her medical restrictions. The court emphasized that Costco was not obligated to create a modified role that excluded essential job functions beyond Zamora’s physical capabilities.
Conclusion
Ultimately, the court concluded that “Costco reasonably accommodated Zamora to try and find vacant positions that would work with her medical restrictions” before terminating her employment in January 2021. The court’s decision to grant summary judgment to Costco underscores the company’s efforts to comply with FEHA regulations while balancing operational needs.
For more insights on this case and similar legal matters, visit MedLegalNews.
